Wednesday, August 17, 2016

OneNote Overview

Good teachers are prepared, organized, creative, resourceful and collaborative. OneNote, from Microsoft, encompasses all of those traits into one structured app. From the planning/creating lessons stage, to the presentation of the lesson to students, to the distribution of assignments, to communication with parents, to reflecting on how the knowledge was received; OneNote offers it all with an easy learning curve. Teachers can download this software and have access to numerous technology tools to implement their lessons in a variety of ways. Videos, audio clips, articles and
drawing tools are all available with a click of a button. Everything for a lesson is conveniently in one place, with organized tabs and the ability to share/edit information with students and colleagues through the OneNote class notebook.


Click to enlarge image.

One example of how OneNote would be an excellent software choice for a music educator, is to implement it as a beneficial resource for a substitute (especially one without a music background), if the music educator is absent for any length of time. The music educator would lose little instruction time, even in his absence, if he created the lesson using OneNote. He could make an audio file of his voice lecturing or giving instructions, maybe insert a YouTube video, add rehearsal tracks, maybe an interactive assignment, and provide additional work under the Homework Tab which could be graded from the comforts of home. Skype is also available through OneNote, so interacting with another ensemble or another director for immediate feedback is available.

Monday, August 15, 2016

Communication, Organization, and PD

A music educator is one of the most visible teachers in a community and needs to be highly organized and great with communication and public relations. With today's technology world, there are a number of programs and apps that allow a teacher to be very effective when scheduling events, contacting parents, and sharing information with the public.

One way a music educator can stay organized is by creating a calendar. Ensemble directors are typically responsible for scheduling performances almost a year in advance and then need to share this information with parents, administrators, and the community. A director can easily create a year-long calendar on Microsoft Word, or can even do so using a Google Calendar. These calendars can then be printed and distributed or even shared via Google Docs, Dropbox, Evernote, or even uploaded to a website or social media apps like Facebook. This will allow both educators and students and their families to be aware of what is happening well in advanced, and keep them organized throughout the year.

A music educator is also responsible for organizing instruments, uniforms, and music, and setting up trips and budgets. Creating and maintaining databases through Google Docs or Mircrosoft Excel, is extremely important for teachers to know what they have, what condition it is in, and what they need in the future. Nowadays, music programs can invest in program like Charms Office Assistant which is a fantastic management, communication, assessment, and financial system that brings all aspects of the job into one program.

As Bauer (2014) states, "the ability to communicate clearly is one of the most important qualities of effective music educators" (p. 170) Purchasing Charms is beneficial but it is extremely expensive for small music programs. Social media apps and websites have made it easy for to spread information to most parents and students, but it does not reach every family. A music educator can create an email list, use an all-call system through their school, or even set up a text message system such as Celly. It is important to have a multitude of methods to reach families in order to run successful programs and classrooms. It is also important to share what your students are doing through newspaper articles, adding performances to YouTube, and even sharing successes in district newsletters.

Being organized is very important for a music educator and his music program, but it is also important to take part in professional development that is relevant to the needs of the educator. Technology such as personal learning networks (PLN), blogs, and online degree programs have been highly educational and useful, but have not always been the most beneficial to my particular needs. I have experienced that my most beneficial professional development happens with "informal experiences such as conversations" (Bauer, 2014, p. 175) with my mentors and administrators. Almost daily, I will call or email more experienced band directors in my area. If needed, I will use these opportunities ask questions about concerns I am having with my own program or will share my thoughts about concerns they have. I will also invite highly successful educators to come rehearse my students so that I can learn and grow with my students. Regardless of how a teacher develops professionally, it is essential for them to do so to stay informed of new approaches for child development and pedagogy. Bauer (2014) states, "the best way to develop one's TPACK utilize it" (p. 185). Regardless of what method they use, they should use these methods daily and continue to seek new ways to use technology for quality student learning.

Tuesday, August 9, 2016

Listening to Music

Music is a part of everyone's life, but they may not realize the extent of its importance. Bauer (2014) says for centuries, music has been used "as a part of ceremonies, for entertainment, as a means of relaxation, and for pure enjoyment" (p. 105). Many people enjoy listening to music, but they may not comprehend the difference between hearing or listening to music. Listening to music requires deeper attention and understanding than hearing a song playing in the background. Music listeners focus on the details, but must be able to comprehend what is happening in the music before determining if they prefer it or not.  Due to this reasoning, it is the goal of educators to teach students to be "lifelong music listeners" (Bauer, 2014, p. 109).

Music invokes a variety of responses to humans. For most of the students in my school, they are able to determine whether they like or dislike a song they hear, but their quick response is always based on whether they do, or do not, prefer the genre of it. What they fail to do, is to listen with an analytical ear to details such as dynamics, lyrics, tempo, tonality, and rhythm before making their final determination. As a music appreciation teacher, band, and choir director, I have found it very important for students to experience multiple genres and forms of music.

Students will always have particular songs and genres that they prefer and connect to over others. Though this is the case, I have experienced that the more they understand about music the more they appreciate all forms and genres. When I ask a student to use music terminology to discuss what he likes/dislikes about a song and/or what the song makes him feel, he is encouraged to listen and to make a deeper connection. Regardless of his immediate reaction, he is encouraged to listen to a new song multiple times to see whether he will gain or lose a preference for it. It is also important for him, and all students, to appreciate and understand a wide variety of music so they can respect the musical preferences of their peers. When a student immediately talks negatively upon an initial hearing of a song he is unfamiliar with, he is disrespecting his peers. As a an adolescent, this is difficult to understand.

New digital technologies such as iPads, iPhones, Spotify, iHeartRadio, etc., has made it extremely easy to introduce new music to a group of students. Students and teachers can now randomly search for a wide variety of music with just a couple clicks on a screen. With a couple more presses of a button, they can immediately share what they found via Twitter, Facebook, or Spotify, and can even digitally download the song to a playlist. It is our job as music educators to make students aware of what is out their, teach them to be lifelong learners through listening, and to appreciate all forms and genres of music, whether they prefer it or not.

Tuesday, August 2, 2016

Assessments in the Classroom

Assessments are an important aspect of what educators do to measure a students growth throughout the duration of a class. The most common assessments that all educators are familiar with are formative assessments and summative assessments. Bauer (2014) says that formative assessment "involves both formal and informal procedures that provide information for the teacher and feedback to the student during the learning process" (p. 133). For example, if a section of students play a particular part of the music, and then immediate feedback is provided, informal assessment is taking place. Summative assessments, however, "summarizes learning at a particular point in time, typically at the end of a project, unit, semester, or entire class (Bauer, 2014, p. 133) Concerts, performances, and/or performance exams at the end of each semester are excellent forms of summative assessment for band and choir teachers. It is very important for educators to use authentic assessments, which requires the performance of a task rather a response on a paper, because it provides evidence of a students understanding for a musical task and/or learning outcome.

In recent years, technology has helped teachers make assessments more reliable and convenient to grade. Word processors such as Microsoft Word, and now Google Docs and Forms, have provided educators the opportunity to easily create rubrics for grading performance-based tests. The best part about these technologies is that they can easily be adjusted and altered for improvement for future years of use. Google Forms and Docs can also easily be shared to large groups of people and can be used to either survey or assess students. This allows students to complete tests from home, school, or anywhere they may have internet access. Other technologies such as metronome and tuner apps, Audacity, Floobaroo, Webquest, and many more open source software are available. Most of which are easy to use and extremely beneficial to both educators and students.

The most important part of assessing students for educators is that they use a reliable rubric. Rubrics use a rating scale and provides expectations and descriptions of the various levels of achievement. The descriptions make assessment more reliable and consistent, but as Bauer (2014) mentions, "they also provide valuable feedback to students on why they were rated on a certain level" (p. 138). Students can use this information as they are producing their product as self-assessment and can decide what needs to be done to reach desired achievement levels. High quality rubrics that are detailed, specific, and reliable will help to keep educators consistent and will eliminate many questions about fairness by students and parents.

It has been my experience that rubrics are incredibly beneficial to both my students and me. Though it is intentional, it is was very easy to grade students using bias instead of grading the quality of the work. Without a rubric, it was also easy for me to accidentally grade students differently between multiple grading sessions because my demeanor changed or I  forgot how detailed I was, or was not being. This was not fair to my students and they realized the inconsistencies and started asking a lot of questions about their performance and why someone did better than them. The introduction of rubrics has solved most of these issues and the students have worked harder to achieve the level of performance they were accepting of.

Saturday, July 30, 2016

Chromatik and SmartMusic

Chromatik

Chromatik is an excellent accompaniment website that provides musicians the opportunity to "play along with sheet music, anytime, anywhere" (Chromatik, 2016) This user friendly resource provides digital sheet music for all genres of music such as pop, classical, and Disney. All of the music, including valuable resources such as scales, are transposed for over 20 instruments including vocal, piano, band, and string instruments. For a price of $10 a month, musicians can play along with sample tracks, record their performance as the pages change automatically, and then share their recordings on Chromatik's "Stage," or via Youtube and email. Chromatik is extremely easy to use and performers of all ages can be watched on the Chromatik website.

Currently, iOS users will benefit the from Chromatic with the features seen in the picture below, as the features are not yet available to Android users.







The metronome and tuner app, along with the ability to mark up the score on an iPad, makes this program a very useful resource for competent music students, performers, and educators. The ability to upload songs and to "favorite" preferred songs, allows users to really personalize their practice and performance sessions.  Musicians can now use their favorite songs to enjoy practicing, and practicing more!
 



SmartMusic

SmartMusic is an interactive accompaniment program that is highly educational and beneficial to the growth of music students and music educators. This is an easy-to-use program that encourages student growth and can be used on nearly every device except iPhones and Android devices. "Student practice is focused because they receive immediate feedback while listening to their performance and seeing the correct and incorrect rhythms and pitches onscreen" (Smartmusic, 2016) The feedback is very detailed and shows students what they played correctly or played incorrectly. Feedback also answers most student questions, such as fingerings and rhythms, without having to contact the teacher. For $40 a year, students can benefit from many SmartMusic features such as accompaniment on any one of 18,000 solos, 4,500 ensemble pieces, or 70 methods.



For $140 a year, educators can personalize lessons based on the weakness of each student. Educators can help their students learn at home without having to be present. Teachers also can use SmartMusic features such as gradebooks and rubrics to keep track of student success and growth. Music educators can request new song titles to be included into the repertoire list of nearly 30,000 titles. The SmartMusic website includes a blog with many useful resources that teachers can use as professional development.

 

Implications

Chromatik and SmartMusic are both great resources to encourage students to practice and perform, however, SmartMusic is much more educational. Though Chromatik allows students to record themselves performing or practicing, it does not give the detailed feedback that allows students to learn and grow. It is a fun way for students to record themselves making music that they love hearing on the radio and they can then share the recording and/or use it self assessment. Educators can use this program creatively by creating an account that all students can access. Students can then record themselves and submit it to the teacher so they can provide the students with feedback. This allows students to pick any song they would like to practice, perform, and create music, without having to pay $120 a year, whilst still getting educational feedback. The only downfall to this is that the educator would still have to spend a significant amount of time reviewing and commenting on student performance.

SmartMusic may be slightly more expensive for an educator to use, and would require all the students to have a $40 a year subscription as well, but the educational value of it makes it worth it. Though the music does not include pop music, this is still a fun way for students to make music. The accompaniment allows students to essentially play along with others, instead of practicing on their own. The immediate feedback and recording capabilities allow students to see and hear exactly what they are doing so that they can learn from their mistakes. Students can then rerecord until they are satisfied with the grade of their performance. When they are satisfied, they can submit their grade to their music teacher. This method takes an immense amount of stress off of the teacher, but the students likely benefit much more than creatively using Chromatik. 


Both methods are fantastic ways to intrinsically motivate students to learn. Students will enjoy these processes and want to do well. Most students will be more intrinsically motivated by SmartMusic because they get the visual representation of what they did correctly or incorrectly, as opposed to simply playing and recording, without seeing, or potentially hearing, what was performed wrong. 




Resources



Chromatik - Explore Free Sheet Music Collections and Play More Music. (2016). Retrieved July 30,
       2016, from http://www.chromatik.com/
 
SmartMusic – Music Learning Software. (2016). Retrieved July 30, 2016, from
        http://www.smartmusic.com/

Thursday, July 28, 2016

Performance and Practice Through Music



In the past, I have given my students an assignment to record themselves performing their audition music. I learned from this project that most students practiced a lot in an attempt to get the highest grade possible. Students also asked a lot of questions about their music and frequently asked for clarity and help. The group of musicians were nervous to record and many had to re-record themselves many times until they were satisfied with the result. Students may not put forth their best effort during daily rehearsals, or simply not be aware that they made a mistake, but my students were truly intrinsically motivated to do well on their recordings. Though it was educationally beneficial, they did not have much fun with it because of the level of stress, so what can be done to make practicing and assessments more fun?  Bauer (2014) states that "researchers have found that students generally prefer to practice with accompaniment" (p. 82), so educators should try to include this technique in their classroom or lessons.

Technology provides a musician the opportunity to rehearse and practice with accompaniment and receive immediate feedback on his performance. This feedback helps to improve his performance level by encouraging him to continue practicing in order to increase his score. Band in a Box, Chromatik, and "SmartMusic may increase student's motivation to practice. Engaging accompaniments that utilize interesting timbres are enjoyable to play along with" (Bauer, 2014, p. 84). SmartMusic allows students to practice their solo's and band repertoire with a recorded accompaniment, but also teaches them good practice habits by focusing on the segments of music they struggle on. Likewise, Chromatik is a fun website that allows students to perform with accompaniment on some of their favorite pop music. Though this is not the standard band literature, it encourages students to practice and to have fun making music. 

Technologies such as these two programs are also beneficial to educators. By providing accompaniment, assessment, and recording features, SmartMusic and Chromatik does not require teachers to spend numerous classroom hours listening to students play for them. They also do not have to spend countless after-school hours trying to squeeze in every student with an accompanist so students can understand how it their solo sounds when it is combined with the piano part. Students can practice at home, email their teachers, and the educators can respond to the recordings or assessment from any computer or smart device. This takes an immense amount of stress off of the music teacher and allows him to focus on rehearsing during class time.



I am very encouraged to find ways to incorporate these forms of technologies into my classroom. Currently, my students are so extrinsically motivated to perform skillfully through ratings, rankings, and state recognition, that they sometimes fail to be intrinsically motivated to do well. Bauer (2014) mentions that "setting and achieving tangible practice goals results in self-satisfaction, leading to greater self-efficacy and increasingly higher-performance standards" (p. 82). It is my goal as an informed and aware  music educator to see that this happens in my band class. 

Tuesday, July 19, 2016

Digital Audio

Digital Audio and Digital Audio Workstations (DAW) provide all individuals with the opportunity to be creative, regardless of their level of music competency. Bauer (2014) states in "Music Learning Today" that by using "loops, MIDI, and digital audio" (p. 64), the product that is created by the user is left up to their own imagination. Since programs like this do not emphasize musical notation as seen in Sibelius, Finale, or MuseScore, users are able to arrange songs that are unique and sophisticated using prerecorded sounds. Since "melodic, harmonic, rhythmic, dynamic, temporal, and timbral elements of music can be explored and varied" (Bauer, 2014, p. 64) on DAWs, the possibilities are endless! One of the best parts about these programs is that users can create, mix, and/or change loops immediately and safely because the original file remains unaltered in the program's library. Another key feature is that these programs will allow users to include their own sound files, whether it be vocal, instrumental, or sound effects, in order to personalize their songs. As an educator, the most exciting part about programs such as Soundation, is that it "advocates for allowing students to compose without notation" which will "often speak to the large percentage of students who have an interest in music but are not involved in school music programs" (Bauer, 2014, p. 60). High-quality sound files such as WAV and MP3 can be produced using these programs, which will provide the opportunity for the user to keep and share his song on his iphone, iPod, and/or other digital music device.

In regard to sound files, there are many forms of sound files that exist in the digital world, but what is the difference? Often times I will select whatever file type I know will compress a song so it is small enough to email, but I am unaware of what this actually does to the track. Bauer (2014) informs that WAV and AIFF are lossless compressions, which create "an exact reproduction of the original sound source" (p. 31).  Lossy compression files such as MP3, AAC, and WMA, however, remove "audio data deemed unimportant to the original sound" (Bauer, 2014, p. 31) and the eliminated data is not recoverable. As I read this, my curious and mechanical mind began to wonder what exactly this unimportant data would be. 

This YouTube Video discusses the difference between the two compression types and explains that regardless of what file type is used, it is extremely difficult to hear any major sound difference. This video does well at demonstrating exactly what the unimportant sounds are that will not be included in a song when compressed to a lossy audio file like MP3. I prefer the sound of the WAV file since it produces a natural sound as if an artist was performing live in a recording studio. For most educational purposes, however, a smaller sound file is just simply more practical. For example, if I have my students use a lossless compression file for their performance recordings, there will be no way for my Google account to store the massive size of the files. Now that I have a better understanding of the different, I will be more considerate as to which compression file I use, or ask for, as I begin to use incorporate more technology into my classroom. The decision may be based on the project; Am I looking for the absolute best sound quality, or am I looking for practicality in regard to storage space?

Wednesday, July 13, 2016

Creativity in Music

As I reflect on chapter 3 of William Bauer's "Music Learning Today" and the composition projects on MuseScore and Noteflight, I can not help but think about what can be done to reach out to "the other 80%," as cited by Bauer on page 46, that are not involved in traditional music programs across the country.

In my rural district in Southeastern Ohio, this 80% is much closer to 90%. With this being said, the annual talent show proves that many students in that 90% are musically gifted. Many students throughout the school have taught themselves how to play guitar, drums, and how to sing, but have not participated in the the school's music program. Though there are still a vast majority who might not know their musical ability, I wonder if more innovative music courses, that uses technology creatively as the main instrument, would encourage more students to bring their known, or unfound, talents to my music room.

After reading chapter 3, I am convinced that creating a class or ensemble such as GarageBand (band) could truly appeal to many of our students. Every student in our building is already provided an iPad or a chromebook by the district which makes programs such as GarageBand, MuseScore, and/or Noteflight extremely accessible. This could be a two semester class where students creatively use these devices and programs to explore, improvise, and compose their own works or to recreate the music they enjoy listening to on a daily basis. This would be a fun way for students to become familiar with the programs, and would allow for teachers to facilitate musical creativity. Bauer (2014) states that "constraints often help to facilitate the creative process, providing a framework, or scaffold, for creative efforts" (p. 51). This can be done in the first semester before moving on to using the same programs to create an ensemble that plays the pieces that were created in the first semester. This course would appeal to many students, regardless of their musical skill or ability, because it involves technology and the music they enjoy. Students who can play an instrument or sing can use these as instruments in GarageBand as part of their projects. Bauer (2014) provides several  creative ways that teachers and students can explore improvisation through technology on page 55, but "modeling by the teacher and receiving appropriate formative feedback will (also) be helpful to student's development."

Though there are numerous possibilities based on the resources available to the students and teachers, a couple of ideas for using technology in creative ways in my classroom are demonstrated in the Youtube videos below.

Solo project or as an ensemble.

Noteflight Project

As an individual who has worked with Sibelius and Finale, I was very impressed with the user friendliness of Noteflight. There was a learning curve to get used to exactly how the program functioned, but after only a short amount of time of using it, I was able to enter the notes of "Bicycle for Two" more quickly than my old computer could keep up with! This program could be very useful to teachers and/or students who do not have the funds to buy the costly license needed to use Finale to its fullest potential. The best part about Noteflight is that there is not a download, so projects can be accessed from any computer through a cloud, regardless of the operating system and/or level of Noteflight they are using.

The free version of Noteflight is not the most practical resource for educators if they are looking to use it to its fullest potential, but the $50-$70 a year for the upgraded versions is much cheaper than the up front cost of Finale or Sibelius. I personally did not like the sound of the midi playback, but if I needed to arrange something quickly without downloading or paying, this is the perfect resource. The free version of Noteflight does not give you the ability to save unlimited number of scores, the ability to use a larger variety of instruments, or to organize students into groups, but is still very practical for any individual who wants to learn how to compose or arrange music.

Friday, July 8, 2016

Technology in the Classroom Reflection

Technology is a very useful tool for educators and for use in the instruction of curriculum to students. Tools such as digital instruments, notation software, computers, iPads, and smartboards, are just a few resources available to educators who seek an innovative and technologically inclusive classroom. Advances in technology throughout the years have allowed students to become very hands-on and actively involved in their education, but many educators do not use the technologies available to them in the most advantageous ways for music instruction (Bauer, 2014, p. 9).

Many teachers simply do not have the budget or facilities to incorporate technological tools in their classroom. Others, however, do not effectively use technology because it is too simple of a tool or is overwhelmingly complex for them to understand. Thus, the major concern is that teachers do not have the amount of professional development and knowledge they need to use technology creatively in their classrooms. When an educator is provided any technological tool, whether it is the simplest or the most complex, he will need to be educated on the best practices to maximize student learning. Too often an educator will be provided a tool and will not be shown how to use it productively in his classroom instruction. Fortunately, Bauer (2014) states "Music Learning Today," will help "teachers develop the ability to understand the dynamics of using technology effectively for music learning" by giving insight on how to use technology. He states that "pedagogical approaches that align technologies with specific curricular outcomes" will also be provided (p. xii). These statements are very encouraging to an educator eager to learn more.

As an educator who has a classroom computer, smartboard, synthesizer, digital recorder, and notation and recording software, I thought I used technology very effectively in my classroom. However, I realized a few things about my methods:
  1. I do not frequently use everything that I have available.
  2. I am not familiar with the potential of the technological tools I do have.
  3. I am unfamiliar with various useful and educational programs/opportunities in regard to technology. 
My favorite technological tool is a digital recorder, and I use this tool in many educational ways. I have my students record themselves for a grade, and I have found that they tend to reflect more on the quality of their efforts when they know their performance will be played back. Often times, students will respond to this by practicing more, focusing on their weaknesses, and making an effort to do their best on the performance at hand. Fortunately, this technology is readily available to students with today's smartphones, iPads, and laptops, and together with my feedback, they can be led to higher levels of achievement.

  I use audio and video devices to record rehearsals and performances as well. I will use these recordings to review what went well and what will need to be improved on at the next rehearsal. These recordings are beneficial to the educational process and are a timely way to assess students. Likewise, the recordings are also a perfect way to assess and reflect on my performance as an educator. I have also found that students like to watch and critique their performances when they are played back on the smartboard. Watching a marching band performance on the smartboard is a very educational way to show students the positive and negative moments in their performance. I will pause the video at transition points in the show, and students will see spacing errors, poor marching technique, and missed visuals from an audience member's perspective. Students will take the knowledge they gained from breaking down the performance and will apply it to their next performance.

I record my students playing audition material and then use Audacity to splice together their best recordings of each excerpt and will give the student their own personal file. This gives them something they can keep and feel proud of and will allow them to think positively of the recording experience. I also recorded two vocal ensembles performing the same tune and entered the multiple recordings into GarageBand so the groups could hear what their combined voices sounded like together. This has proved to be a fun activity, but I did not realize that something like this could be a much bigger project!

I am unfamiliar with programs such as "Rock Our Work, Google Lit Trips, and Music-Comp: Music Composition Online Mentoring Program" (Bauer, 2014, p. 7) which allows students to use technology, such as recordings and GarageBand, to collaborate and work on a common project with musicians from around the world. Knowledge of these organizations and programs provides exciting possibilities for both my students and me, but I will definitely need to become more technologically savvy and familiar with the programs available to a music educator who is interested in creating an interactive classroom. Fortunately, with apps and websites like Twitter, Facebook, and Feedly.com, resources for professional development can be brought to my immediate attention with the simple click of a button!!


As I have become curious to what can be done with the technology available to me, I found a Youtube video about an interactive classroom in Ireland that I thought was worth sharing. I think an interactive classroom environment like this would be very enjoyable for students of all ages, and likely an opportunity for students to show their teachers something new about technology!



References:
Bauer, W. (2014). Music Learning Today: Digital Pedagogy for Creating, Performing, and
        Responding to Music. Oxford University Press: New York.


E. (2015). Interactive classroom: ICT in the music classroom, Ireland. Retrieved July 06, 2016, from
        https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ccyDRguJf3c